Legal Opinion

Rummel v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1951No. File No. 9198PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSickel, J.

The question here presented arises under the state inheritance tax laws. After Franklin Rummel, a resident of South Dakota, died there was found in his safety deposit box United States Saving Bonds payable either to “Franklin Rummel or Matilda Rummel” or to “Franklin Rummel or Jacob P. Rummel”. The bonds were purchased by decedent with his own money. Matilda Rummel and Jacob P. Rummel were sister and brother of the deceased. In the inheritance tax report the executor of the estate of Franklin Rummel stated: “Note: Decedent during his lifetime owned $30,543.00 United States Bonds payable to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edds v. Mitchell, Admr.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State Board of Equalization v. ColeMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Myers EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Mitchell v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Littlejohn v. County Judge, Pembina CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Veve v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  3. In Re Messerschmidt's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Littlejohn v. County JudgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. MesserschmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API