Legal Opinion

Halliburton Co. Benefits Committee v. Graves

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 13, 2007No. 06-20632PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor judge in regular active service of the court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc (Fed. R.App. P. and 5th CiR. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Having carefully considered the petition for rehearing, we clarify that this decision results from and is limited to the specific language used in the corporate documents involved in the Halliburton-Dresser merger. For the reasons stated in the panel opinion,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Halliburton Co Bnft v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Halliburton Company Benefits Committee v. James GravesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. Sterling Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. Johnson v. Meriter Health Services Employee Retirement PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
  3. Pactiv Corporation v. Reynolds Group Holdings LimiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API