Legal Opinion

Walz v. Walz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun. (Smith, J.) Bill to restrain defendant from interfering with complainant's rights in a certain stairway. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This bill was filed to obtain a perpetual injunction against the defendant, restraining her from obstructing or in any manner interfering with the complainant's rights in a certain stairway, leading from the street to the upper floor of a store building.

This building was owned, prior to February 27, 1880, *168by John B. Tyler and wife, and consisted of a brick block of 40 feet frontage, and extending back from 60 to 80 feet. It was divided into two stores. On tbe first floor a permanent wall partition divided the stores from front to rear. A stairway of three or four feet in width was built…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lathrop v. ElsnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Von Meding v. StrahlMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ives v. EdisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Greve v. CaronMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. First National Trust & Savings Bank v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Smith v. DennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API