Legal Opinion
Hughey v. Lind
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 10, 1988No. 85-6-269; CA A43976PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
In this action to set aside a fraudulent conveyance, plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants entered after a trial to the court in which the court found that the transfer had a legitimate purpose and, therefore, was not fraudulent. On de novo review, we reverse.
Defendant DML, Inc., was established in the early 1970s by defendants David W. and Margaret Lind for the purpose of distributing supplies to hairstyling salons. They were the only shareholders. On January 28,1984, they passed a resolution to dissolve DML, but did not execute the Articles of Dissolution until May 7, 1984. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Evans v. TrudeOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Bivens v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Matter of Marriage of Smith and SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- 27 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1390, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,983 in Re Blair B. Woodfield, Debtor. In Re Marie Z. Woodfield, Debtor. In Re Parley A. Pearce, Debtor. In Re Deanna Pearce, Debtor. Emmett Valley Associates v. Blair B. Woodfield Marie Z. Woodfield Parley A. Pearce Deanna Pearce Quality Foods, Inc., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Emmett Valley Associates v. WoodfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Page Family Preservation Trust B v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991