Legal Opinion

Bivens v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 1984No. 81-06-17,469-L; CA A27084PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiffs were guarantors on a statutorily required livestock agency bond issued to Vale Livestock Auction Co. (Vale Livestock) by Merchants Mutual Bonding Company. After Vale Livestock’s default, the bonding company brought an action in federal district court against plaintiffs on their guarantees. Satisfactions were given on judgments against both plaintiffs Bivens and Munsterman on October 8, 1980, and a dismissal due to compromise was entered on behalf of plaintiff Garrett on October 27, 1980. Plaintiffs thereafter commenced this action to impose a constructive trust on assets received…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clarke v. Philomath CollegeOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Gantenbein v. BowlesOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Nelson v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stach Construction Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 27 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1390, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,983 in Re Blair B. Woodfield, Debtor. In Re Marie Z. Woodfield, Debtor. In Re Parley A. Pearce, Debtor. In Re Deanna Pearce, Debtor. Emmett Valley Associates v. Blair B. Woodfield Marie Z. Woodfield Parley A. Pearce Deanna Pearce Quality Foods, Inc., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Browning v. Williams (In Re Silver Wheel Freightlines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1986
  3. Allen v. MeinigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Hughey v. LindCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Emmett Valley Associates v. WoodfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API