Legal Opinion

Malone v. Foster

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1998No. 97-0661PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEnoch, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, and GONZALEZ, HECHT, SPECTOR, OWEN, ABBOTT, and HANKINSON, Justices, join, and in which BAKER, Justice, joins in Parts II and III.

In this case, the Malones ask us to recognize an independent cause of action for intentional or negligent spoliation of evidence by parties to litigation. The court of appeals declined to recognize such a cause of action. 956 S.W.2d 573, 582. In Trevino v. Ortega, issued today, we held that Texas does not recognize an independent cause of action for evidence spoliation by persons who are parties to the underlying lawsuit. 969…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCraw v. MarisTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Trevino v. OrtegaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Swap Shop v. FortuneTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Malone v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hyundai Motor Co. v. VasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cortez Ex Rel. Estate of Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mount v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  5. Buls v. Fuselier, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API