Horner v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s motion to dismiss was sustained in an opinion per curiam, as follows:
Plaintiff filed his petition herein to recover compensation under the Act of June 25,1910, as amended, and the “Boyalty Adjustment Act” of October 31, 1942 (35 U. S. C., §§ 42, 68, and 89 to 96, inclusive), for the alleged unauthorized use by defendant of two unpatented inventions or devices.
The first claim asserted in the petition relates to the alleged use by defendant of plaintiff’s unpatented inventions or devices for “illusionary or ‘dummy’ weapons of warfare.”
From the allegations of the petition and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Fulmer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Yassin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Patton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Robbins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grayton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- International Engineering Company v. RichardsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973