United States v. Hirsch
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellants were indicted in twenty counts charging them, and others, with using the mails in furtherance of a scheme to defraud (U. S. C. title 18, § 338 [18 USCA § 338]), and in one count of conspiracy to violate the mail fraud statute (U. S. C. title 18, § 88 [18 USCA § 88]). The proof established the scheme or artifice by which they defrauded the various victims to-be the incorporation and use of the Sheldon Hosiery Company, Inc., and the Mills Research Corporation, through which they popularized and sold hosiery for women throughout the United States. It was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CrehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Dominic AlaimoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Samuel H. Sheppard v. E. L. Maxwell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.