Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Bigham

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 6, 1940No. 45017PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStiger, J.

The heirs at law of Rebecca A. Bigham, a devisee under the will of her husband, James Bigham, brought this suit to secure a construction of the will alleging that Mrs. Bigham, who predeceased her husband, was given an undivided one-half interest in the estate, and under the antilapse statute, section 11861, they inherited the property devised to Mrs. Big-ham. The trial court sustained the claim of the heirs. Beatrice Scott Bigham Mclnerney, a beneficiary under paragraph three of the will, appealed. The material portions of the will are as follows: ■

“First, I desire that all my debts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Iowa City State Bank v. PritchardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Canaday v. BaysingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Hiller v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. In Re Guardianship of McCauleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Frazier v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moore v. McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  2. Catlin v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. In Re Estate of LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. In re Estate of ColemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Central National Bank & Trust Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API