Legal Opinion

South Pymatuning Township Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1962No. Appeal, No. 236PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Keim,

In this appeal, the supervisors of South Pymatuning Township, a second class township in Mercer County, are requesting this court to determine the propriety of an attempted annexation by the Borough of Clarksville also situate in Mercer County.

This annexation proceeding and the pending appeal arise under the Act of July 20, 1953, P.L. 550, 53 P.S. §67501 et seq.

It is interesting to note that Hickory Township is also interested in annexing a part of the area in question and that most of the Borough of Clarksville and a large part of the area to be annexed will be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Irwin Borough Annexation Case (No. 1)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. West Conshohocken Borough AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Dallas Borough Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Lancaster City Annexation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. West Mead Township Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Ambridge Borough Electors PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Cooke v. GreenvilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Pennsylvania Builders Ass'n v. Carroll Valley Borough, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County2005
  5. Commonwealth v. Swank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API