Legal Opinion

State v. Serio

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 2, 1999No. 17164-7-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.

Edward Serio pleaded guilty in late 1987 to first degree theft. As part of his sentence, the court imposed restitution, court costs and a victim assessment. Ten years later, the Legislature amended the restitution statute to extend jurisdiction over offenders an additional 10 years. Following this amendment, the State moved to extend jurisdiction over Mr. Serio. The motion was granted and Mr. Serio appeals, contending the 1997 amendment to the restitution statute violates the constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws. On the basis of State v. Shultz, 138 Wn.2d 638, 980 P.2d 1265…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In the Matter of Personal Restraint of PowellWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Forster v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API