Legal Opinion
Armand Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 2, 1936No. 195PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
We have already once decided this motion without opinion, and we now state our reasons in the hope that this at least may end the matter. The argument is based upon the notion that the “cease and desist” order of the Commission was a nullity because of the departure, or variance, between it and the complaint on which the Commission heard the cause. Apparently it is also supposed that our order affirming it was likewise a nullity, though before us at least there was a controversy to be decided, however void the order reviewed. Passing that question and before addressing ourselves to the first…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. Austin-Bagley CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Feder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- L. G. Balfour Company, a Corporation, and Burr, Patterson & Auld Company, a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Leon A. Tashof v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Ted Bates & Company, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.