Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Feldhaus, Sr.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 1950No. 7190PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.:
The defendant owned a farm of 204 acres. • He made an arrangement with the plaintiff, whereby the latter was to conduct the activities thereon for an indefinite period. The plaintiff was to furnish all machinery and labor and each was to furnish one-half of the seed, and they were to share equally of the yield of the crops and animals. Fifty acres of corn and fifty acres of wheat were to be planted. The defendant prepared a written agreement containing these and other terms, and both parties signed it. It provided that “All profits should be shared equally.”
The…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Tibbs v. National Homes Construction Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- Power Motive Corp. v. Mannesmann Demag Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Miller v. Grimsley (In Re Grimsley)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Paul v. First National Bank of Cincinnati, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.