Legal Opinion
Power Motive Corp. v. Mannesmann Demag Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 28, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-K-13PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Power Motive Corporation brings suit for damages against Mannesman Demag Corporation alleging breach of a distributorship agreement between the parties. Specifically, Power alleges that Demag wrongfully 1) terminated the par ties’ agreement (Counts 1 through 6), 2) failed to repurchase Power’s inventory upon termination (Counts 7 through 9), and 3) failed to support Power’s sales efforts and by-passed Power with direct sales, (Counts 10 through 13). Power seeks compensatory and punitive damages for Demag’s alleged breach as well as…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Southern Ohio Bank, Under the Will of Virgil A. Diperna, Deceased v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- National Metropolitan Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Crim Truck & Tractor Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc., Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Rita C. O'neal, Cross-Appellant v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc., and General Foods Corporation, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Hansen v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.