Legal Opinion

Vandermark v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Ralph Vandermark (Petitioner) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying his request for administrative relief. Petitioner’s counsel has filed an application for leave to withdraw his appearance on behalf of Petitioner on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and has submitted a letter in support of the application. For reasons set forth in this opinion, we deny counsel’s petition for leave to withdraw without prejudice and direct counsel to refile the application once he has complied with the requirements of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Hont v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Epps v. BD. OF PROBATION & PAROLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Wesley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Strothers v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Funk v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Johnson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. E.O. Buxo v. PPBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Walker v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API