Legal Opinion
Pruitt v. Cheney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1992No. 87-5914PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel has voted unanimously to amend the opinion previously issued in this case. The amended opinion is attached and is ordered filed.
With that amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and of the proposed amendment to the opinion, and no judge of the court has requested a vote to rehear the matter en banc.
The petition for rehearing is hereby denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
OPINION
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, Reverend…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Thomasson v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Joyce L. Walmer v. United States Department of Defense and Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Jantz v. MuciCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Able v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Dahl v. Secretary of the United States NavyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.