Legal Opinion

In re Seltzer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1993No. 92-1400PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This case presents the issue of whether orders issued by the Administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation pursuant to R.C. 4121.-44(R) are subject to review under the Administrative Procedure Act, R.C. Chapter 119. For the reasons stated below we find that such orders are not subject to appellate review pursuant to R.C. Chapter 119.

The Ohio Constitution provides for the creation of the courts of common pleas. The Constitution, however, does not confer jurisdiction on the courts. Rather, it provides that the grant of jurisdiction must be conferred on the courts by the legislature.…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mason v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. RohdaOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Nielsen v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Baltimore Ravens, Inc. v. Self-Insuring Employers Evaluation BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Columbus Checkcashers, Inc. v. Guttermaster, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API