Legal Opinion

Tuntland v. Haugen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1948No. 30448. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

A decree of the circuit court of DeKalb County ordered partition of a parcel of real estate among Bertha, Amos, Thomas T. and Ray Tuntland and Melaie Haugen. The three last named prosecute this appeal, a freehold being necessarily involved.

Thomas J. Tuntland died intestate on February 6, 1936, leaving as his heirs-at-law his wife, Ellen, then seventy-four years of age, and their six children, Bertha, Amos, Ray, Thomas T. and John Tuntland, and Melaie Haugen. Tuntland owned a farm of eighty acres in DeKalb County and, upon his death, his wife, Ellen, became the owner of an undivided one-third…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brod v. BrodIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Kane v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Jones v. KoepkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Heineman v. HermannIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Houdek v. EhrenbergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scanlon v. ScanlonIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In Re Estate of WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hanley v. HanleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Craven v. CravenIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Wright v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API