Legal Opinion

United States v. Parsons

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided June 21, 1990No. 2:88-cv-00075PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., Congress established a fund, commonly known as the “Superfund,” for the purpose of removing hazardous materials. The facts underlying this case, which was brought by the government to recover costs it incurred in cleaning up such materials, are set forth in this Court’s summary judgment decision. United States v. Parsons, 723 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ga.1989). In that decision, the Court determined (1) that all the defendants were liable,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K., Tokyo v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Dedham Water Company v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. Birdie Mae Davis, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Edwin Foster, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, James E. Buskey v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, Birdie Mae Davis, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, James E. Buskey, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. James Parsons, Steve Baxter, Proposed IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API