Legal Opinion

United States v. James Parsons, Steve Baxter, Proposed Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 22, 1991No. 90-8779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

The government sued several individuals, a corporation, and a limited partnership under provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). 1 The facts of the case are summarized in the district court’s order finding the defendants liable. 2 The district court awarded the government $2,260,173.72, which was three times the government’s “response costs” — costs the government incurred in cleaning up the hazardous chemicals deposited by the defendants. 3 The government then moved to amend the judgment, claiming that it was entitled to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Dedham Water Company v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. Walls v. Waste Resource Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Regan v. Cherry Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989
  5. Linda Walls v. Waste Resource CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolina Transformer Company Dewey Strother Kenneth Ray Strother Faytranco, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Allied-Signal, Inc..District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API