Legal Opinion
Garner v. Roberts
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 29, 1999No. A98A1229PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Nathaniel Garner appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Dr. Marc Roberts in this action to collect on an account for dental services rendered. We affirm for reasons that follow.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). Our review is de novo, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. Matjoulis v. Integon Gen. Ins. Corp., 226 Ga. App. 459 (1) (486 SE2d 684)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Bob v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Daniel v. Corporate Property InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Balke v. Red Roof College Park Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Finnerty v. STATE BANK AND TRUST CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Vadde v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Tyler v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Boaz v. LatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- City of Gainesville v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.