Legal Opinion
People v. Duncan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1963PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
The defendant was convicted of crimes of forgery and larceny and a closely divided Appellate Division affirmed the resulting judgment. The evidence being more than ample to support the jury’s verdict, our sole problem is to determine whether prejudicial error was committed which requires reversal and a new trial.
The record establishes that the defendant, who shared an apartment in Eoehester with William Trimmer, appeared at the office of the Beneficial Finance Co. in that city on August 3,1961, and obtained a loan of $400; he posed as Trimmer, exhibiting several of the latter’s cards — a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. SorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- People v. MleczkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- People v. CarboranoNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- People v. McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- People v. . WeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. PapernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. NapoletanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- People v. LongwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. RowleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.