Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 22, 2015No. CV-14-939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCliff Hoofman, Judge

| Appellants Raymond and Patricia Edwards appeal from the circuit court’s denial of their motion for custody of their granddaughter, M.A.E., who had been adjudicated dependent-neglected and placed in the custody of appellee, the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS). On appeal, appellants argue (1) that their appeal was timely pursuant to Rule 2(c) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure — Civil1 and (2) that there was insufficient evidence that the order denying them custody of M.A.E. was in her best interest. Because the circuit court’s order did not comply with Arkansas Rule of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kowalski v. Rose Drugs of Dardanelle, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Foreman v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Stouffer v. Kralicek Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Edwards v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API