United States v. Bell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Carolyn Ann Bell filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The court denied the motion and denied Defendant’s request for a certificate of appealability (COA). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (requiring COA to appeal denial of § 2255 relief). Defendant seeks a COA from this court. We grant her motion to proceed in forma pauperis but deny the application for a COA and dismiss the appeal because she waived her right to pursue a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. PinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. LonjoseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012