Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2011No. 11-6080UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Carolyn Ann Bell filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The court denied the motion and denied Defendant’s request for a certificate of appealability (COA). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (requiring COA to appeal denial of § 2255 relief). Defendant seeks a COA from this court. We grant her motion to proceed in forma pauperis but deny the application for a COA and dismiss the appeal because she waived her right to pursue a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. PinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. LonjoseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API