Legal Opinion

City of Fort Smith v. Housing Authority of Fort Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1974No. 73-222PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Hoi.t. Justice.

By a declaratory judgment action, the appellant city sought to establish that it was empowered by Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-1042 et. seq. (Supp. 1973), Act 266 of 1971, to adopt an ordinance to amend the procedure, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-3006 (Repl. 1968), Act 77 of 1943, for the filling of vacancies on the local Housing Authority Board of Commissioners as well as the right to increase the size of the Board. Further, appellant averred that the action of the Housing Authority in filling the vacancy after the adoption of the ordinance was void. The trial court held that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Hogue v. the Housing Auth. of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Rainwater v. HaynesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Nahlen v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Commissioner of Labor, C. R. Thornbrough v. Danco Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. City of Hot Springs Advertising v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API