In the Interest of B. M.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.
Adjudicated delinquent based on evidence of having participated in a mugging of three victims that involved kidnapping and robbery, minor B. M. appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. We hold that the testimony of one victim that B. M. hit that victim while the other two victims were simultaneously attacked by companions of B. M. sufficed to sustain a finding that B. M. was a party to the crimes involving the other two victims, particularly considering B. M.’s conduct before, during, and after the crimes. Accordingly, we affirm.
Our standard of review…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conway v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- In the Interest of A. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In the Interest of T. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- In the Interest of J. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- In the Interest of D. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Interest of D. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- In Re DWCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.