Interest of D. W.

Barnes, Judge.

Following an adjudicatory hearing, D. W was adjudicated delinquent for robbery by sudden snatching.1 After the denial of his motion for new adjudicatory hearing, he appeals contending that the evidence was insufficient. Upon review, we affirm.

On appeal, we view the evidence from an adjudicatory hearing in the light most favorable to the prosecution to determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the juvenile committed the acts charged. The evidence is examined under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, '318 (99 SC…