Legal Opinion

Rush v. Rush

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

Briefly this complaint alleges that the parties are husband and wife; that the plaintiff turned over to the defendant his wages for many years and also certain' lump sums under an agreement that ■ the defendant would pay certain expenses and accumulate the surplus in joint deposit accounts and joint investments, the defendant to act as agent and trustee of the fund for the plaintiff; that the defendant kept some of such surplus in the joint names of the parties and some in her own name; that the plaintiff and defendant have separated; that she retains all the papers in her exclusive control,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Schantz v. . OakmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. In Re the Estate of SuterNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Fur & Wool Trading Co. v. George I. Fox, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Gedney v. . GedneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Hawthorne v. HawthorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. In re the Estate of McCarthyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. Chiang v. ChangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. 300 Broadway Realty Corp. v. KommitNew York Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API