Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Ridley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1979No. 34833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

In this certiorari, we examine service in public transportation condemnation actions. Code Ann. Ch. 95A-6. The Court of Appeals held that the "personal service” required under this Act, Code Ann. § 95A-606, did not include all the variations provided in the Civil Practice Act, Code Ann. § 81A-104 (d), but mandated that the condemnee be handed the petition individually. Dept. of Transportation v. Ridley, 149 Ga. App. 16 (253 SE2d 563) (1979). We disagree and reverse.

Service in this case was performed by handing Mrs. Grace Ridley three copies of the condemnation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nodvin v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Knight v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Critz Buick, Inc. v. AliottaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Department of Transportation v. RidleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. ALPHA TRANSPORTATION SERVICE, INC. v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Everetteze v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Department of Transportation v. RidleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Dorsey v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API