Legal Opinion

Evans v. Armenta

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided September 30, 2015No. Civil No. 14-329-GFVTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge

This action has been brought to recover monies allegedly received from the operation of “an unlawful multilevel marketing ‘pyramid’ scheme which collectively generated gross revenues of approximately $252 million from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2012.” [R. 13 at ¶ 37.] Plaintiff (hereinafter, “Receiver”) has been appointed Receiver for Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., FHTM, Inc., Alan Clark Holdings, LLC, FHTM Canada, Inc. and Fortune Network Marketing (UK) Limited, and their affiliates, subsidiaries,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. 16630 Southfield Ltd. Partnership v. Flagstar Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
  2. Milligan v. MayDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API