Jackson ex dem. Smith v. Vrooman
New York Supreme Court
THIS was an action of ejectment,- brought -to recover part e£ Lot No. 196., in Klock and Nellis’s - patent, situate in the town of Palatine, An the' county of'Montgomery.
Read the full summary
THIS was an action of ejectment,- brought -to recover part e£ Lot No. 196., in Klock and Nellis’s - patent, situate in the town of Palatine, An the' county of'Montgomery. The cause was tried'before Mr. Justice Yates, at the -Montgomery circuit, in August, 1815.. ■ ' • The plaintiff claimed-under proceedings and judgment'm partition, in the court of common pleas; oLthe county of MbntJ gomery, under which the premises in question were sold by commissioners appointed by the order of the court, .who conveyed the same to the lessor of the plaintiff, by deed,-dated the 19th. January, 1814. . The…
1Per curiam
The premises in question are claimed as being a part'of lot No. ,106», ia Klock 4r Nellis’s patent, and the lessor of the plaintiff makes title, to'the same; under proceedings in partition,:by which it appears, that lot No. 107.'was ordered to'be sold, and a deed was given for it.by the commissioners, ‘bearing date 'the 1-9th- of January, 1814.' No part- of the proceedings are particularly! set out. But it is not pretended that the defendant was a party to those proceedings ; and he' claims title to -the same premises; tinder a deed from George Ten .Eyck, bearing date, the 17th -of April,.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Cohen v. KylerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Doyle v. O'NeilMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879