Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Kyler

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1858PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from, and Error to, St. Louis Land Court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court. cited Woodf. Land. & Tenant, 432, 607; 3 Mo. 286; 1 Term, 378.

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, Judge

The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant for the use and occupation of a dwelling house, and for damages, alleging that the defendant wrongfully took down and carried away fixtures that belonged to the plaintiff, to-wit: “ Sundry lead pipes and plumbing work, bath tub, two sinks and waste pipe.” It appears from the bill of exceptions that the defendant, for the purpose of securing the payment of a debt, executed a deed of trust conveying a lot and dwelling house in the city of St. Louis, and authorized the trustee, in the event of a failure to pay the debt, to sell the property.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hood v. MathisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  2. Preston v. BriggsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
  3. Miller v. PlumbNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  4. Kirwan v. LatourGeneral Court of Virginia · 1802
  5. Jackson ex dem. Smith v. VroomanNew York Supreme Court · 1816

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rogers v. CrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  2. Crane Co. v. Epworth Hotel Construction & Real Estate Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Armour Packing Co. v. DickmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Goodin v. Elleardsville Hall Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Thompson v. Granite Bituminous Paving Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API