Legal Opinion

Posey v. Rome Oil & Fertilizer Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1923No. 3786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The bankruptcy act Of 1898, sec. 6 (Collier on Bankruptcy, 9th ed., 279), confers jurisdiction upon the courts of bankruptcy to set aside exemptions to bankrupts as may be claimed by them in conformity to the State laws on that subjéct, in force at the time of the filing of the peti-' tion. .See McGahan v. Anderson, 113 Fed. 115 (51 C. C. A. 92, 7 Am. Bkr. R. 641); In re Gerber, 186 Fed. 693 (108 C. C. A. 511, 26 Am. Bkr. R. 608); In re Baker, 182 Fed. 392 (104 C. C. A. 602, 24 Am. Bkr. R. 411). But the bankruptcy act does not confer jurisdiction on courts…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Freedman Bros. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  2. Evans v. Rounsaville & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Pincus v. Meinhard & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. McGahan v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. McLainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Roquemore v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Roquemore v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Roquemore v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API