Andre v. Case Design, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
{¶ 1} The plaintiffs-appellants, J. Richard and Margaret Ann Gilman Andre, appeal from the trial court’s judgment of December 16, 2002, denying their motion for prejudgment interest, pursuant to R.C. 1343.03(C), after a jury had awarded them $715,000 in damages for personal injuries and loss of consortium. Because the trial court’s understanding of the parties’ settlement negotiations was fundamentally flawed, we hold that it abused its discretion when it overruled the Andres’ motion for prejudgment interest.
FACTS
{¶ 2} In May 1993, the Andres purchased a condominium unit for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Kalain v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Viox v. WeinbergOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Krieger v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Fenner v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Jontony v. ColegroveOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Luri v. Republic Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.