Legal Opinion
Conway v. Cumming
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 9, 1993No. 92-286Published
1Opinion of the Court
636 A.2d 735 (1993)
Charles CONWAY
v.
Georgia CUMMING, Philip Fitzpatrick, Philip Scripture and Joseph Patrissi.
No. 92-286.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
July 9, 1993.
Motion for Reargument Denied November 2, 1993.
Charles Conway, pro se.
Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Atty. Gen., Montpelier, and Thomas J. Rushford, Asst. Atty. Gen., Waterbury, for defendants-appellees.
Before: ALLEN, C.J., GIBSON, DOOLEY and JOHNSON, JJ., and PECK, J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.
GIBSON, Justice.
Plaintiff was convicted of sexual assault, sentenced to a term of five to twenty years, and is now an inmate committed to the custody of the…
Also in this document: Dissent · Dooley; Dissent · Dooley.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.