Legal Opinion

Roy A. Scheperle Construction Co. v. Seiferts, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1984No. WD 35718PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Chief Judge.

Scheperle Construction Company sought recovery in quantum meruit for construction work. Scheperle was a subcontractor under Fashion-Par for construction work performed for Seiferts. The court entered judgment in favor of Seiferts on Schep-erle’s claim. Because Fashion-Par defaulted, the court entered judgment against it in favor of Scheperle.

On this appeal, Scheperle contends that it was entitled to recover on its quantum meruit theory; that the court erred in taxing all costs against it; and that it was entitled to recover as a third party beneficiary. Affirmed.

Seiferts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green Quarries, Inc. v. RaaschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Byrd v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. FutheyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. County Asphalt Paving, Co. v. Mosley Construction, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Cox v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Wheelhouse Marina Real Estate, L.L.C. v. BommaritoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Davis Industrial Sales, Inc. v. Workman Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API