Legal Opinion

Longview Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Nabours

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1984No. 9227PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Longview Savings, successor to Metropolitan Savings, appeals from a district court judgment granting Mr. and Mrs. Nick Nabours exemplary damages, attorney’s fees, and a permanent injunction prohibiting the foreclosure of a deed of trust lien. The controversy arose when Longview Savings threatened foreclosure of its lien on the Nabourses’ home, and they brought suit alleging that Longview Savings was guilty of common law fraud, violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act1 and had waived its right to foreclose. The jury found that Longview Savings had waived…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nabours v. Longview Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Attayi, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  3. Moritz v. Bueche, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Klaus P. Schmueser and Ursula v. Schmueser, Cross-Appellees v. The Burkburnett Bank, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Shaver v. Schuster, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API