Legal Opinion

Richard v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 11, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

The City of Fort Lauderdale ■ adopted Resolution 1427 for the purpose of issuing “refunding bonds of 1941” to refund refunding bonds, Series of 1937, and forthwith filed its petition in the circuit court looking to their validation. Appellant as complainant filed his bill of complaint seeking to restrain the City from issuing, validating, and negotiating the proposed refunding bonds. Answer was filed, testimony was taken, and on final hearing, the restraining order was denied and the injunction suit dismissed. This appeal is from the final decree.

It is first contended that the outstanding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. State v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Manatee County v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. State v. City of ClermontSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Tivas v. TivasSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. the City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, N.A. v. Southfield Farms, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API