Legal Opinion

Kahl v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 3, 2004No. A04A1206PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

Following a bench trial, the trial court convicted George Kahl of driving with an unlawful alcohol level and following another vehicle too closely. Kahl appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of a State-administered chemical breath test. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

When reviewing a ruling on a motion to suppress, we construe the evidence in a light most favorable to the trial court’s findings and judgment. So viewed, the evidence shows that, on November 11, 2002, a car driven by Kahl rear-ended another vehicle.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Oliver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Handschuh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Handschuh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Handschuh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Handschuh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API