Legal Opinion

Eagerton v. Klingler

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 12, 1982No. Civ. 3090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

Review by certiorari is sought here of an order holding petitioner in contempt for failure to answer questions propounded to him concerning his sales tax liability and for refusal to produce sales records demanded by the Alabama Department of Revenue (Revenue Department).

On October 11, 1979 the Revenue Department issued a notice to petitioner requesting him, under the authority of § 40-23-22, Code 1975, to produce certain business records for the purpose of assessing his sales tax liability. Petitioner thereafter wrote to the Revenue Department, questioning the authority of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Robert M. McCoy and Charles SussmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Ex parte DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Murphy v. MurphyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  5. Stern v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Klingler v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Eagerton v. KlinglerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API