Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard S. Connors

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 21, 2006No. 04-3478PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Divorce rates are disturbingly high. Sometimes, marital splits get nasty when an ex-spouse decides to dish out a little dose of discomfort to his or her former partner. And as far as dishing out discomfort is concerned, the havoc visited on Chicago lawyer Richard Connors by his ex-wife would win a gold medal for creativity. With substantial assistance from his ex, Connors stands convicted in federal court of (among other things) violating a law we seldom encounter, the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA), 50 U.S.C.App. §§ 5(b)(1) and 16. Today, we resolve Connors’s appeal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. 5443 Suffield Terrace, Skokie, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. LumanOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. United States v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Perez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. State v. LumanOregon Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API