Legal Opinion
State v. Luman
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 2009No. CC 04102244; CA A132197; SC S056470Published
1Opinion of the Court
223 P.3d 1041 (2009)
347 Or. 487
STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review,
v.
John Frederick LUMAN, Respondent on Review.
(CC 04102244; CA A132197; SC S056470).
Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.
Argued and Submitted March 6, 2009.
Decided December 31, 2009.
Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With her on the briefs were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Chris Dunfield, Petersen, Dunfield & Fahy, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.
GILLETTE, J.
The state appeals from a Court…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.