Legal Opinion
Charles Franklin Bratten, III v. Citibank, N.A., et al.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 12, 2026No. 1:25-cv-03351Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHARLES FRANKLIN BRATTEN, III, Plaintiff, v. Civil No.: 1:25-cv-03351-JRR CITIBANK, N.A., et al. Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the court is Defendant Citibank, N.A.’s (“Citibank”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. (ECF No. 15, the “Motion.”) No hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md. 2025). I. BACKGROUND AND UNDISPUTED FACTS Except where indicated, the following facts are undisputed. Plaintiff applied for a Citibank credit card account on November 24, 2022, which included an arbitration…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Smith v. SpizzirriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. MorianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.