Legal Opinion

Cami v. Central Victoria, Ltd.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1925No. 370PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a suit to prevent the collection of a tax imposed by a municipal ordinance of Carolina, Porto Rico, on the ground that the ordinance is void. The Supreme Court of the Island upheld the tax, 30 P. R. 413, but the judgment was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 295 Fed. 809, following its decision on the same day in Successors of C. & J. Fantauzzi v. Municipal Assembly of Arroyo, 295 Fed. 803. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court. 265 U. S. 577. Had the Circuit Court of Appeals deferred to the local interpretation of Porto Rican statutes, we should not have granted a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. StengerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Successors of C. & J. Fantanzzi v. Municipal Assembly of ArroyoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yu Cong Eng v. TrinidadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Fajardo Development Co. v. CamachoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1926
  3. Porto Rico Distilling Co. v. SeijoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1931
  4. West India Oil Co. v. de CastroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
  5. Pueblo v. Blanco MateoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API