Legal Opinion
Windsor v. Bristow
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 2018No. 17CA86PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Lonny Bristow, appeals the Richland County Court of Common Pleas issuance of a consent order establishing a stalking civil protection order pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. Appellee is Darlene K. Windsor.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND THE CASE
{¶ 2} On August 31, 2017 appellee filed a petition for civil stalking protection order pursuant to R. C. 2903.214 seeking protection for herself, her spouse, and her children. Within the petition she alleged that appellant was a "convicted vexatious litigant" who filed multiple lawsuits against her seeking damages from $25,000.00 to $100,000.00 and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Sapp v. Franklin County Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Mayer v. BristowOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Sanitary Commercial Services, Inc. v. ShankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clements v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2025