Howsley & Jacobs v. Kendall
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
Writ of error was granted in this case-because we were of the tentative opiniom that the closing argument of respondents’ counsel to the jury constituted reversible-error. After submission of the case upom briefs and oral argument, we adhere to our-tentative opinion. The judgments of the-District Court and the Court of Civil Appeals are reversed and the cause remanded; to the District Court for another trial.
In the District Court, Mrs. W. S. Kendall and W. S. Kendall, Jr., as beneficiaries, under the wrongful death statute, Article-4671, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Stats., and as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'N v. HaywoodTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- P. J. Willis & Bro. v. McNeillTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. DicksonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Wade v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Southern Pacific Company v. HubbardTexas Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Living Centers of Texas, Inc. v. PenalverTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Melendez v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Lee v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Austin v. Weems, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.