Legal Opinion

Howsley & Jacobs v. Kendall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1964No. A-9528PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

Writ of error was granted in this case-because we were of the tentative opiniom that the closing argument of respondents’ counsel to the jury constituted reversible-error. After submission of the case upom briefs and oral argument, we adhere to our-tentative opinion. The judgments of the-District Court and the Court of Civil Appeals are reversed and the cause remanded; to the District Court for another trial.

In the District Court, Mrs. W. S. Kendall and W. S. Kendall, Jr., as beneficiaries, under the wrongful death statute, Article-4671, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Stats., and as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'N v. HaywoodTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. McNeillTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. DicksonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Wade v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Southern Pacific Company v. HubbardTexas Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Living Centers of Texas, Inc. v. PenalverTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Melendez v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. Lee v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Austin v. Weems, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API