Legal Opinion

Theranos, Inc. v. Fuisz Pharma LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 26, 2012No. Case No. C-11-05236-YGRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order Granting Defendant John R. Fuisz’s Motion to Dismiss and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants Fuisz Pharma LLC, Richard C. Fuisz, and Joseph M. Fuisz’s Motion to Dismiss

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Theranos, Inc. (“Theranos”) and Elizabeth Holmes (“Holmes”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action on October 26, 2011 against Defendants Fuisz Pharma LLC (“Fuisz Pharma”), John R. Fuisz (“Attorney John”), Richard C. Fuisz (“Richard”), and Joseph M. Fuisz (“Joseph”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging various patent and state law claims. Specifically,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Front Row Technologies, LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  2. Rustico v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API