Legal Opinion
888 7th Avenue Associates Ltd.Partnership v. Arlen Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 30, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered December 21, 1990, denying defendant Arlen Corporation’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint, aimed at piercing a corporate veil, for failure to state a cause of action, or other relief, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
New York law permits a litigant to disregard the corporate form where a corporation is shown to be a mere shell dominated and controlled by another for the latter’s own purposes (Mikropul Corp. v Desimone & Chaplin-Airtech, 599 F Supp 940). The allegations that Arlen, the parent incorporator and sole…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conan Properties, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Mikropul Corp. v. Desimone & Chaplin-Airtech, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Eastern States Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. William L. Crow Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Austin Powder Co. v. McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Gateway I Group, Inc. v. Park Avenue Physicians, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Maltz v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Lally v. Catskill Airways, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Goya Foods, Inc. v. Unanue-CasalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.