Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. W.R. Grace & Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided December 30, 1992No. 89-3022PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
This cause is before the Court on Grace’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Because the overwhelming majority of court decisions favor the position of the State Farm, the Court denies this motion except as to Count III of State Farm’s complaint (breach of express warranties).
State Farm filed its original complaint on January 30, 1989. Pursuant to Grace’s motion to dismiss and State Farm’s withdrawal of certain claims, State Farm filed an amended complaint on December 12, 1991. In the amended complaint, State Farm relies on five…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- San Francisco Unified School District v. W.R. Grace & Company-ConnecticutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- State of California Department of General Services v. W.R. Grace & Co. (In Re W.R. Grace & Co.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2009