Keefe v. Spangenberg
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RALPH G. THOMPSON, District Judge.
This action is before the Court, for consideration of the defendants’ Motion to Suspend Legal Proceedings. Plaintiff has responded in opposition to the motion and briefs have been submitted by the parties in support of their respective positions.
Defendants contend that defendant Spangenberg is currently enlisted in the United States Marine Corps and is therefore entitled to relief pursuant to the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 as amended (50 U.S.C.App. §§ 501-591). Upon consideration of the briefs and authorities cited by the parties,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of GranthamSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Bruder v. CarlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- TIC Federal Credit Union v. Diaz (In Re Diaz)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1988
- Burke v. KesslerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024